Port Alternative: Atmosly

While Port focuses on service catalog and developer portal, Atmosly provides a complete platform combining service catalog with native CI/CD pipelines, visual workflow builder, GitOps (ArgoCD/Flux), Kubernetes management, FinOps cost optimization, security scanning, and enterprise governance. Port requires external CI/CD tools; Atmosly has everything built-in.

Yes, Atmosly can import your service catalog and self-service actions from Port. Many teams keep Port's catalog structure and add Atmosly for CI/CD, deployments, and governance. The migration is gradual—you can start with automated workflows while maintaining your existing service catalog approach.

Yes, Atmosly provides service catalog capabilities with service discovery, golden paths, templates, and self-service actions. Unlike Port, Atmosly also includes the complete CI/CD pipelines, K8s management, and deployment automation needed to actually provision and deploy those services—not just catalog them.

No, Atmosly has native CI/CD pipelines built-in with visual workflow builder and deployment automation. Port is catalog-only and requires external tools like Jenkins, GitHub Actions, or GitLab CI for actual provisioning and deployments. Atmosly provides the complete platform in one solution.

Atmosly provides self-service capabilities including service templates, automated provisioning, golden paths, and approval workflows with full CI/CD automation. Port offers self-service actions but requires integrations with external tools to actually execute them. Atmosly's self-service includes the complete automation stack.

Yes, Atmosly includes FinOps capabilities with cost analytics, resource optimization, right-sizing, and cost allocation by team/project. Port does not provide cost optimization features. Teams using Atmosly typically reduce K8s and cloud costs by 30-50%.

Yes, Atmosly can import your Port service definitions and maintain catalog compatibility. You can keep using Port for service discovery while leveraging Atmosly for the actual CI/CD, deployments, K8s management, and governance. This gives you the best of both worlds during migration.

Atmosly provides policy-as-code using OPA (Open Policy Agent) with pre-built policies for security, compliance, and cost governance. Policies automatically enforce standards during provisioning and deployment. Port has limited policy capabilities focused on catalog governance only.

Port uses per-entity pricing for catalog items, which can grow expensive with many services. Atmosly uses per-cluster pricing and includes complete CI/CD, not just cataloging. When factoring in external CI/CD tools Port requires, Atmosly often has similar or lower total cost—plus Atmosly's FinOps features reduce infrastructure spending by 30-50%.

Yes, Atmosly is built for Kubernetes with native multi-cluster management, GitOps (ArgoCD/Flux), advanced deployment strategies (blue/green, canary), policy enforcement, and cost optimization. Port provides basic K8s cataloging but not the actual K8s management, deployments, or operations capabilities that Atmosly includes.