Keep self-service. Add the ops loop.
Qovery gives developers a PaaS-like self-service experience on their own cloud. Atmosly shares that ease and goes further into operations: AI incident response, continuous posture, and cost — so self-service does not stop at deploy.
- ✓ Self-service deploys
- ✓ Read-only to start
- ✓ No self-host upgrades
Two good tools, built for different scopes
Both work with Kubernetes. The real question isn't whose feature is better — it's how much of the lifecycle you want one product to own.
Qovery brings a Heroku-style experience to your own cloud account. A developer connects a Git repository and Qovery provisions the environment, builds the container, and deploys it to your AWS, GCP, Azure, or Scaleway — with ephemeral preview environments on every pull request, plus a clean console, CLI, and API.
That developer experience is genuinely good, and for many teams it's enough. The trade-off is depth after the deploy: once an app is live, diagnosing incidents, proving continuous compliance, and breaking spend down per workload fall to separate tools. Qovery is built to ship code, not to operate, secure, and optimize it for the months that follow.
- Delivery-focused — day-2 is thinner
- No AI SRE or root-cause analysis
- No continuous compliance posture
- No deep native cost intelligence
Atmosly is one unified Kubernetes platform. Code flows through visual CI/CD and GitOps; the AI SRE agent watches what's running and proposes ranked fixes; the security engine scans posture continuously; and cost intelligence shows where the money goes.
It's fully managed and agent-based — no self-hosted upgrades to chase. And the SquareOps services team can implement and run it for you.
- AI SRE: root cause + ranked fix PRs
- Continuous CIS / PCI / SOC 2 posture
- Built-in cost intelligence & FinOps
- Fully managed — zero upgrade toil
Qovery deploys easily. Atmosly deploys and operates.
Keep the self-service developer experience. Atmosly adds the AI SRE, posture, and cost loop that follows the deploy.
An AI SRE for what's running
When a pod OOMKills or a service crash-loops, Atmosly infers the actual root cause and opens the PR that fixes it — with a full audit trail. Read-only by default, every action reversible.
- Root cause in under a minute, fix proposed
- Read-only by default — every action reversible
- No runbooks to write, no rotation to staff
Continuous posture, not a build-time scan
Always-on scanning against CIS, PCI DSS, SOC 2, and NSA hardening, with audit-ready evidence on demand — watching the live cluster for drift, not just images at build time.
- CIS · PCI · SOC 2 · NSA frameworks built in
- Drift caught on the running cluster
- Audit-ready evidence exported on demand
Cost you can see, leaks closed automatically
Per-namespace and per-workload cost, right-sizing from real usage, and waste detection built in — reconciled to your bill, with guardrails that scale non-prod down on a schedule.
- Cost by service & namespace, reconciled to the bill
- Right-sizing from real usage, not guesswork
- Guardrails scale non-prod down on a schedule
Qovery vs Atmosly, capability by capability
The capabilities below are the ones Atmosly brings to one platform. We've kept Qovery's genuine wins in the table too.
Qovery's strengths are real for the job it's built for. Atmosly's case is scope and managed operations across the whole loop.
Which one is right for your team?
Here's how to decide based on scope and who you want running the platform.
- Developer self-service deploy is the main need
- You want a PaaS-like experience on your cloud
- Quick app and environment spin-up matters most
- Deep ops, posture & cost are secondary
- A lighter delivery platform fits your team
- You want delivery plus AI SRE, security & cost in one loop
- You'd rather not spend engineer-weeks self-hosting a platform
- Continuous compliance posture matters, not just scans
- You want auto root-cause and fix PRs for incidents
- You'd like a partner (SquareOps) to implement and run it
The bottom line: if your priority is the fastest possible developer self-service on your own cloud, Qovery is a strong, focused choice. If you want that same self-service and the operate-secure-optimize loop that follows it — incidents with a root cause, continuous compliance, and per-workload cost — on one managed platform, that's the case for Atmosly.
From Qovery to Atmosly in an afternoon
No big-bang migration. You connect read-only, see value first, and adopt the rest of the loop at your own pace — keeping the GitOps and Helm you already run.
Connect read-only
Import your existing EKS, GKE, or AKS cluster — public or private — in minutes. Nothing changes; Atmosly just starts observing.
Bring what you run
Point Atmosly at your existing clusters, Git repos, and Helm releases. It's standard Kubernetes underneath — nothing to recreate.
Turn on the loop
Switch on visual CI/CD, the AI SRE agent, continuous security, and cost intelligence as you're ready — one capability at a time.
Hand off the toil
Atmosly is fully managed — no self-host upgrades to chase. SquareOps can run day-2 operations for you if you'd like.
What teams comparing Qovery ask
Is Atmosly a PaaS like Qovery, or something different?
Can developers self-serve deployments and environments?
Do we lose ephemeral / preview environments if we switch?
What happens after the deploy — how does day-2 compare?
Does it run on our own cloud, and will we be locked in?
Qovery has a free tier — how does the cost compare?
How much work is migrating from Qovery?
Which clouds and Kubernetes clusters are supported?
Keep what works. Close the loop.
Connect a cluster read-only and watch your deploys, incidents, posture, and spend show up in one place — in minutes. Free, no sales call.